Celtic’s response to the tennis ball protest aimed at Celtic largest minority shareholder Dermot Desmond at St Andrews Old Course yesterday afternoon was shift and hard hitting…

A long and angry statement was posted last night on the official Celtic FC website presumably with the involvement of Dermot Desmond. A year ago an angry rant was directed at Brendan Rodgers with the Irish Billionaire putting his name to that statement which was also posted late at night on the official Celtic website.

Then when Ross Desmond read out that statement at the Celtic AGM shortly after Rodgers resigned he made it clear that this was a message from his father.

Last night’s angry statement by contrast gave no indication of the author of the text. You therefore have to make your own assumptions and if you reach the same conclusion as me then you’ll think it was the work of Dermot himself.

Here’s what was posted on behalf of Celtic Football Club with many decision being taken which seem to have been decided without any formal board involvement, unless some kind of emergency board meeting was called to decide on what to do about tennis balls appearing on a golf course and the implications that could have for many football supporters at Celtic Park.

Celtic Football Club statement

Celtic Football Club condemns in the strongest terms the deliberate disruption which took place today at the Alfred Dunhill Links Championship at St Andrews.

This was a premeditated action. The Club is aware that it was discussed and planned in advance at a meeting of the Celtic Fans Collective committee. Minutes of that meeting record a proposal specifically to disrupt the event at St Andrews using tennis balls and banners, coordination with supporters intending to attend, and an agreement that Collective funds would be used towards materials for the protest.

Following today’s incident, the Celtic Fans Collective published footage of the disruption on its own social media account together with a statement supporting the action and the message it was intended to convey.

Celtic Football Club has never sought to prevent supporters from expressing criticism of the Club, its Board or its shareholders. Supporters are entitled to disagree with decisions, to make their views known and to protest peacefully. What occurred at St Andrews represents a significant and unacceptable escalation.

A group purporting to act in the interests of Celtic supporters deliberately took a dispute concerning Celtic Football Club beyond Celtic Park and beyond football, to the home of golf, and disrupted an internationally recognised sporting event involving participants, organisers and spectators who have no involvement whatsoever in that dispute. In doing so, those responsible have sought to attach the name of Celtic and its supporters to their conduct on a public and international stage.

Celtic’s reputation has been built over generations, and our supporters have earned a worldwide reputation for the extraordinary passion, loyalty and commitment with which they support their Club. That reputation was built over many decades by generations of Celtic supporters.

Those responsible have brought shame upon the name of Celtic Football Club and upon a reputation which generations of Celtic supporters have spent more than a century building.

Over the past year, however, the conduct of the Green Brigade and those operating through the Celtic Fans Collective has increasingly threatened to undermine that hard-earned reputation. Repeated acts of disruption and escalation, culminating in today’s pre-planned disruption of an entirely unrelated sporting event, risk creating an image of Celtic supporters which is wholly unrepresentative of the overwhelming majority of those who follow the Club.

The reputation of Celtic supporters belongs to the entire Celtic family. It does not belong to any self-appointed group, and no such group is entitled to diminish it in pursuit of its own agenda.

The Club no longer accepts that the Celtic Fans Collective can credibly claim to represent the wider Celtic support. Those responsible for today’s events certainly do not speak for the many thousands of Celtic supporters who express their views passionately, peacefully and responsibly.

The Club will not be intimidated or coerced by organised acts of disruption. Nor will decisions concerning the stewardship of Celtic Football Club be dictated by those prepared continually to escalate their behaviour in an attempt to exert pressure upon the Club, its employees, directors, shareholders or others associated with Celtic. There is a line between protest and deliberate disruption. Today that line was crossed.

The Club has repeatedly sought engagement with supporter groups and, where restrictions have previously been imposed, has sought to provide a route by which relationships could be rebuilt on the basis of responsible conduct. Most recently, the Club met representatives of the Celtic Fans Collective in good faith in an effort to engage constructively with the concerns they wished to raise.

It is therefore particularly regrettable that, while the Club was continuing to engage in good faith, the Collective was planning and authorising further organised disruption. This follows the pattern of events surrounding the Stuttgart fixture earlier this year, when constructive engagement was similarly accompanied by plans for disruptive action.

Today represents a further and more serious escalation. This time, the disruption was taken entirely outside Celtic and outside football, intruding upon an unrelated sporting event and targeting an individual while participating in that event in a private capacity.

The conduct of the past year, culminating in today’s events, has demonstrated that the basis for constructive engagement has been fundamentally undermined. Accordingly, the Club will no longer recognise the Celtic Fans Collective as a representative body speaking on behalf of Celtic supporters and will cease all engagement with the Collective with immediate effect. The Club is examining today’s events. Any individuals or groups who are established to be involved in planning, facilitating or participating in this action will be banned indefinitely from Celtic Park.

No supporter requires the permission of Celtic Football Club to disagree with its Board. But equally, no supporter group has an entitlement to repeatedly disrupt events, intimidate individuals or seek to coerce the Club and then claim to do so on behalf of the Celtic support.

Celtic will continue to listen to and engage with supporters who wish to make their voices heard constructively and responsibly. There are many established channels through which supporters can do so, and today’s decision does not diminish the Club’s commitment to meaningful supporter engagement. But engagement requires responsibility. The Club will protect its employees, directors, shareholders and supporters.

The reputation of Celtic Football Club is non negotiable.

Have a read at this response to the statement from one Celtic supporter on x…

Don’t mistake this for a second he is furious and it is vented in the expedited statement from Celtic PLC.

If only they were as quick with issues involving injustices against the club and it’s supporters.

The length of this statement, its furious tone and the speed with which it appeared late in the day tell their own story. Someone clearly wanted this dealt with immediately.

Where was that urgency when Celtic supporters needed the club to speak up over serious incidents affecting them? Why does this protest warrant such a lengthy denunciation when other matters have met with silence?

You can disagree with what happened at St Andrews and still question this response. The statement repeatedly invokes shame, intimidation and coercion. Those are serious accusations. Explain what conduct supports them.

The language is also depressingly familiar from previous statements attacking supporters. To my reading, it sounds like the anger of the Desmond family being delivered through Celtic’s official channels. If that is the case, it raises a serious question about the use of shareholder influence: the club’s voice should serve Celtic’s interests, not settle a powerful shareholder’s personal grievances.

And look at the optics. A protest at a golf tournament has now become a much bigger public story, amplified by the club’s own response. People who might never have noticed it are now asking: what is going wrong at Celtic?

Who thought this statement would improve that situation? Who decided that indefinite bans and ending engagement would resolve the underlying dispute?

Celtic’s reputation belongs to the entire Celtic family. It is not the personal property of the Board or the Desmond family.

“The reputation of Celtic Football Club is non negotiable.”

So is accountability. That applies to those running the club as well as those supporting it.

— Glasgowsmilesbetter (@theoldgovanarm1) October 4, 2026

Glasgowsmilesbetter (@theoldgovanarm1) responded as follows…

Don’t mistake this for a second he is furious and it is vented in the expedited statement from Celtic PLC.

If only they were as quick with issues involving injustices against the club and it’s supporters.

The length of this statement, its furious tone and the speed with which it appeared late in the day tell their own story. Someone clearly wanted this dealt with immediately.

Where was that urgency when Celtic supporters needed the club to speak up over serious incidents affecting them? Why does this protest warrant such a lengthy denunciation when other matters have met with silence?

You can disagree with what happened at St Andrews and still question this response. The statement repeatedly invokes shame, intimidation and coercion. Those are serious accusations. Explain what conduct supports them.

The language is also depressingly familiar from previous statements attacking supporters. To my reading, it sounds like the anger of the Desmond family being delivered through Celtic’s official channels. If that is the case, it raises a serious question about the use of shareholder influence: the club’s voice should serve Celtic’s interests, not settle a powerful shareholder’s personal grievances.

And look at the optics. A protest at a golf tournament has now become a much bigger public story, amplified by the club’s own response. People who might never have noticed it are now asking: what is going wrong at Celtic?

Who thought this statement would improve that situation? Who decided that indefinite bans and ending engagement would resolve the underlying dispute?

Celtic’s reputation belongs to the entire Celtic family. It is not the personal property of the Board or the Desmond family.

“The reputation of Celtic Football Club is non negotiable.”

So is accountability. That applies to those running the club as well as those supporting it.

A perfect summary.

HAVE YOUR SAY – Join the Celtic conversation in our comments section below…

Quick Tip – Add Celticshorts.com as your ‘Preferred Source’ on Google News for quick access to the Celtic content you value the most. It takes just a few seconds and you’ll notice the difference straight away! – Click HERE….Hail Hail!