Has Celtic ended the window stronger than we entered it? Yes we have, but the same old boardroom failures are still evident…

On the conclusion of each and every transfer window, we can measure our success in the recruitment process by asking one simple question, and that is:
Has Celtic ended the window stronger than we entered it?
Historically it would be resounding no, but as we reflect on the 2026 summer transfer window that has now closed, we can say with confidence that we’ve massively improved our playing squad over the course of the past few months.

We’ve lost the likes of Daizen Maeda, Reo Hatate and Arne Engels, all key first team players, whilst Kelechi Iheancho and Marcelo Saracchi who were both highly influential in the title run in have also moved on despite their own desire to stay at Celtic.

But to counter that loss, we’ve added Camilo Duran, and Kasper Hogh, two champions league proven strikers for a combined £17 million, as well as Egyptian World Cup star Haissem Hassan who cost a reported £9 million.

In midfield we added German under 21 international Mika Baur for £6 million, and spent £3.4 million on promising Dutch youngster Joel Van Der Berg. Danish midfielder Oliver Sorensen has also arrived on loan from Serie A side Parma to give our midfield an extra boost of quality.
Highly rated Chelsea striker Shumaira Mheuka and fellow blues teenager Landon Emenalo have also arrived on loan to bolster our ranks, as has Swiss right back Jordan Lotomba, and English goalkeeper Sam Johnstone to give our squad a more solid look heading into the 2026/27 campaign.

Despite this mixture of quality and potential arriving through the Celtic Park doors, the same problems that have plagued our club in recent transfer windows has reared its ugly head once again.
Several targeted players were well within our grasp, and yet again we failed to act.
The likes of Niko Sigur was keen to join the club, and let’s not forget the fiasco that was the Marcelo Saracchi saga, but yet again the club failed to act upon deals that were there for the taking.

Lithuanian International Gvidas Gineitis was also within our grasp but probably due to our disastrous Champions League capitulation in Linz after being 4-0 ahead in the tie, any move for the Torino midfielder was rendered dead in the water.
Perhaps if he had been signed BEFORE the playoff matches against LASK things would have been different?
Let’s not forget the goalkeeping dilemma, which despite it being known that we needed a new man between the sticks, it took us until the last 48 hours of the transfer window to sign Wolves Keeper Sam Johnstone on a loan deal.
These are all the same problems we’ve encountered in recent transfer windows and yes. it may get airbrushed a little because of our terrific bits of business, but the same old failures are still highly evident.

Celtic don’t want to spend the hoarded cash, now sitting at around £100m, so they were only willing to spend transfer incoming coming in the door. If Champions League qualification was automatic for the Scottish Champions that would be fine. But there was £40m – sitting waiting to be lifted and due to Celtic’s lack of defensive midfielders – someone like Gvidas Gineitis for instance – that money was thrown away.
Chris Sutton called it correctly all summer long and unfortunately he was proven to be spot on. The transfer business for the Champions League qualifiers has to be done at the start of the window to give us the best possible chance.
So the Celtic squad as it looks today looks stronger but when it mattered most, in Linz under a fortnight ago, it was fatally weaker as far as our Champions League chances were concerned. Yes we can blame the players and guys like Luke McCowan, Tony Ralston and Dane Murray got plenty of stick, particularly the unfortunate former Dundee man.

But the very fact that they were on the park at all that night shows how little Martin O’Neill had to work with away to LASK. That isn’t his fault, or Luke’s. It’s the fault of the decision makers at the club. The ones who make the same mistake time and time again and never realising the sums of money and the prestige for Celtic Football Club that is lost by their failed strategy.
As per the banner the North Curve held up at the Falkirk game…

Just an Ordinary Bhoy
HAVE YOUR SAY – Join the Celtic conversation in our comments section below…

NEW FROM CELTIC STAR BOOKS…Celtic in the Fifties by Matt Corr, in two volumes, available now…


Quick Tip – Add Celticshorts.com as your ‘Preferred Source’ on Google News for quick access to the Celtic content you value the most. It takes just a few seconds and you’ll notice the difference straight away! – Click HERE….Hail Hail!


1 Comment
How desperate are you becoming in trying to promote such nonsense?
Even moreso on a match day?
MoN got it wrong tactically, with continuing with the open game approach, especially with a 4 goal lead to defend?
Yet just how many complaints were there, after 120 minutes of the tie?
This despite riding our luck, during those 120 minutes of the tie?
Yet no manager accounts for school boys errors, committed by nygren and Trusty? Even our captain calmac getting himself totally out of position on the 3rd goal, while still chasing a game, we were ahead within? To finally get undone by the mistake from McCowan?
After 120 minutes of the tie, no-one would have seen ourselves pressing the self destruction button, in the manner that we managed to?
And yet there remains the promotion of the failings upon the field of play, is somehow the blame of the board, for the likes happening?
But let’s do some reality instead of looking for the blame game with made up nonsense?
17 players are still involved within our finalised europa league again this season?
Just so happens to be our core group, from last season europa league campaign, where we looked nowhere near a CL quality team?
We weren’t a good team with the football last season, and even worse without it, and somehow that was expected to totally change during the summer period, within our core group of players?
Yet the highlight of last season European campaign, was eventually winning not 1, but 2 matches away from home in European football?
Both by MoN, so what’s the actual excuse for the 10 years beforehand? Especially with the amount of matches involved?
We have already massively improved as a team, with the football in an attacking sence imo?
Yet to be determined, just how good we can be without the football? Especially within our europa league campaign? But the signs weren’t great during the Lask tie, which eventually cost ourselves so badly?
So defensively, questions remain for European football, this despite having 10 of our defensive options, still within our squad for this season europa league campaign?
So MoN has placed more focus upon midfield and attacking areas. Hardly surprising where we didn’t have a proper functioning midfield area in operation for the best part of last season, along with the problems of scoring goals?
Leaving them so late within matches, was never going to be sustainable either?
So our next manager is going to have to address our defensive fragility. Which is usually what any new manager will be looking to do, in order to set out how our team set up, and intends to play?
The problem will remain, that we play the majority of our matches on the front foot, especially in possession, against where we will play even more games upon the back foot, especially at CL levels?
The question still remains, as to whether a defensive midfielder, would work with calmac as captain?
That’s the main question any manager is going to face, and consider what solutions can be found, especially as the defensive element within the game of Calmac, has never been his strongest quality factor within his own game?
Are you really suggesting that such decisions remains with the board?
When it’s footballing decisions that remains with our manager?